On my google I have various topics that may interest me coming up. However, I notice that Charlie Dimmock and how she has changed over the years seems to be there more and more often and the tone is not very flattering; commenting on how much she has changed over the years. I find it rude that in this day and age the media feel it is perfectly fine to comment about a woman’s looks rather than her talent. - in this case her green fingers. We all change as we age but it seems that it is still allowable to comment freely on a woman whereas a man is assessed on his ability rather than his appearance. What do you think?
I've got another 'keen'... Ouch!
Well Labour’s “patriotism” didn’t last very long, did it? 🇬🇧
Last weekend, in Rutland, the first statue in Britain of the late Elizabeth II was unveiled.
What are these orange stains that have appeared on my hands overnight?